Well, yesterday, yet another YouTuber was arrested. This time is was Norman Leboon, Sr. for threatening to kill Eric Cantor, the Virginia Congressman.
From the Philadelpia Inquirer…
Norman Leboon, 38, of the 1600 block of Benner Street in Mayfair, was charged by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia with two counts involving threats against U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor, the Republican House whip.
Leboon was arrested Saturday by the FBI, three days after his YouTube video was seen by someone in San Francisco and reported to the FBI.
Well how about that? Someone posted threats on YouTube? Say it isn’t so! The funny (or not so funny) thing is that it’s just possible that the FBI ignored Leboon’s brother’s reporting on his brother because, well, threats are nothing new at YouTube. They are everywhere.
YouTuber AllahAkChew had a threat posted on her channel just today by user MujahidAK74U . Even the user names are threatening — take killkuffs for example. It doesn’t take a lot of cognitive ability to realize that “killkuffs” means kill kafir — kafir being the term that muslims use for non-believers. Then there are all the terrorist avatars that YouTube ignores. If you think I’m kidding, just go look through the avatars on IslamicRevolutionTV’s subscribers page. Here are a few samples:

And then there are the backgrounds that people put on their channels, which are a whole other story. The point is, YouTube turns a blind eye every day to the hatred and violence and threats and thereby hosts a culture of threats and violence.
And if a user is suspended, they just come back under a new user ID like Colleen LaRose did, while again, YouTube turns a blind eye. Their policies state that you are not allowed to make a new ID when you are suspended, but it’s up to the community to bring it to YouTube’s attention. I can understand that they have so much video uploaded every day, yada, yada, yada. Just because something is difficult to do, you are not absolved of your responsibilities. (“Yeah, Mr. IRS man, those tax forms are just too difficult…” Wonder how that’d work out…! )
How many true believer whackjobs like Colleen LaRose, Normal Leboon or Nidal Hassan is it going to take for YouTube to own their responsibility? Yeah — it’s rhetorical. The answer is, most likely never.
A friend has come up with another way to hold Google/YouTube’s feet to the fire though, and it is ingenious. Google and YouTube have advertisers. I doubt those advertisers would be happy to see their ads on pages that advocate things like killing U.S. Congressmen or wiping out the Jews. Maybe a hit in the pocketbook is the cattleprod we need to wake up Google/YouTube.
All hands on deck – let’s roll!
Related Jawas post – heh!


2 responses to “YouTube’s Terrorist Tolerance”
opusrex
March 30th, 2010 at 10:59
Star, are we suppose to just contact said businesses? I’m not sure how much a complaint will do since it is commmon for businesses to do the same as Youtube/Google and ignore the customer.
Current business philosophy is “The customer is our Enemy”.
http://lists.essential.org/1998/corp-focus/msg00023.html
If we’re going to really get their attention, we’ve got to put as many of their customers eyes on this. Sunshine is the best disenfectant.
StarCMC
March 30th, 2010 at 11:06
Yes, we should contact the businesses. Take screenshots of the juxtaposition of the ads with the offensive videos or backgrounds. If you’ve got a blog, post your screenshots along with any correspondence from the business. The more attention we draw to it, the better.
3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
uberVU - social comments March 31st, 2010 at 17:25
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ladyravensdc: YouTube’s Terrorist Tolerance @StarCMC_FR http://tinyurl.com/yg7g6ru #tlot #tcot #news #islam #ocra #hhrs #a4a #PCkills…
YouTube’s Selective Policy Enforcement « StarCMC’s Enemedia Roundup April 1st, 2010 at 09:22
[...] So gee, YouTube, would you care to explain that little bit of bias? They can holler kill kafir at the top of their lungs — provided it’s done in Arabic so only the terrorists can understand what they’re saying, but God (not Allah) forbid that we translate what they are saying to English because, well, that’s offensive? Give me a freaking break. Either what they say is offensive, or it isn’t. But hey, what more could we expect from this culture of violence that’s hosted at YouTube. [...]
The YouTube Terrorism Threat « StarCMC’s Enemedia Roundup May 5th, 2010 at 10:08
[...] YouTube Terrorism Threat The members of YouTube Smackdown, Quoth the Raven, FreeRepublic, the Jawa Report, Stable of the Zionist Hores [...]